Unleashing Your Creative Potential with Design Thinking

Unleashing Your Creative Potential with Design Thinking

 

 

 

 

Key Steps in Satellite Design: From Requirements to Release

A Complete Guide to the Structured Design Process for CubeSats and PocketQubes

📅 Updated: October 15, 2025
⏱️ Reading Time: 12 minutes
🎯 Level: Intermediate to Advanced
✍️ Author: Andrew Dunn

When developing the Claymore deployer or designing subsystems for satellites, following a structured design process is essential. The design process is a systematic approach that covers everything from the initial stages of capturing requirements to the final release of the design.

The design process helps identify where you are in the project and how to turn an idea into a functioning design. It provides clarity, reduces costly mistakes, and ensures all mission requirements are met.

The Complete Satellite Design Process

Design Process Flow

1. Requirements
2. Research
3. Concepts
4. Detailed Design
5. Prototyping
6. Testing
7. Release

↻ Feedback loops occur throughout all stages

1

Requirements Definition

Before any work should ever be carried out, you must always record the requirements you need to meet. These can come from the customer, mission needs, and standards that you'll need to adhere to from launch vehicles and space organizations such as ESA, NASA, ISRO, JAXA, or Roscosmos.

Keep in Mind: Your requirements may be subject to change due to project constraints, new developments as you progress, and better understanding of the problems. Therefore, always ensure your requirements are kept up to date.

Key Activities in Requirements Phase

  • Map out mission processes: Include testing, launch, and mission operations to help define requirements for each subsystem
  • Begin initial FMEA: Identify potential issues that could be avoided early in the process
  • Identify subsystems: Define specific requirements for thermal, electrical, communications, ADCS, power, and other subsystems
  • Focus on minimum requirements: Prioritize what allows your satellite to perform its mission; save "nice to have" ideas for future iterations
2

Research Phase

This is when you research potential solutions that will enable the team to develop a satellite that meets mission requirements. It's valuable to investigate whether a solution to your problems has already been developed or if similar problems have been solved.

🌟 Cross-Industry Inspiration

Don't restrict yourself to space in your research. You'll be surprised how you can take inspiration from other fields such as automotive, aerospace, naval, oil & gas, and even agriculture.

Real Example: In previous PocketQube projects, inspiration was taken from the farming industry for a release mechanism. After contacting their suppliers, it was clear it wouldn't withstand launch loads, but a space-rated alternative used in CubeSat missions was found.

Recommended Research Sources

  • Patents: Discover innovative solutions and understand existing IP
  • Academic papers: Access cutting-edge research and methodologies
  • Standards: Review space agency and industry standards
  • Industrial magazines: Stay current with industry trends
  • Experts in your field: Gain insights from experienced professionals
  • Suppliers: Learn about available components and technologies
  • Networking events: Connect with industry professionals

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

3

Initial Concepts

Once requirements and project scope have been identified and agreed upon, it's time to begin developing initial concepts for your satellite and subsystems. But before you jump to 3D modeling, sketch out your ideas first.

Remember: CAD software is like any other tool—whether it's a spade, CNC mill, or drill—you need to know what you're planning to do before using it effectively.

Concept Development Best Practices

  • Break down the satellite: Divide into subsystems and map how they'll interact
  • Consider manufacturing early: Will components be turned, milled, or 3D printed? Will the chassis be a box extrusion, bolted panels, injection molded, forged, or bent sheet metal?
  • Avoid costly rework: Understanding manufacturing constraints early prevents having to redo 3D models
  • Use volume claims: Create volume allocations for each subassembly (payload, radio, ADCS, etc.) to identify potential clashes before they arise
  • Generate multiple concepts: Brainstorm with your team—more concepts make it easier to cover all requirements

Concept Selection Strategy

Once you've developed concepts and reviewed them with the team, select the most promising designs to progress further. Advance the top 3 designs—sometimes you'll need to revert to a previously rejected concept when new information, scope changes, or requirements make the "best" design unsuitable.

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

4

Detailed Design

Once you've identified the most promising designs, it's time to add more detail to your concepts—enough to carry out a second down-selection where you'll choose the most viable design for your satellite. After selecting your concept, finalize that design so you can proceed to prototyping and testing.

V-Model Approach

Depending on your design methodology (such as using the V-model), you might manufacture and test each subsystem before completing the final design. This means the detailed design, prototyping, and testing processes occur concurrently.

Critical Activities in Detailed Design

  • FMEA Analysis: Identify potential pitfalls in your design before they happen
  • Manufacturing Process Mapping: Map out manufacturing and assembly processes for each component and assembly
  • Tolerance Analysis: Ensure components fit together properly with appropriate clearances
  • Poke-Yoke Implementation: Design mistake-proofing features into your satellite

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

5

Prototyping Phase

In the prototyping stage, you'll carry out various functional tests of each component and subassembly to prove out working concepts. But before any testing, you should create a Design of Experiments (DoE) for each test you want to conduct. This helps with project scheduling and ensures you're testing components in conditions that replicate their actual application.

Benefits of Subsystem Testing

By testing each subsystem individually, you can spot potential failures that can be fixed before integrating your satellite. This helps debug your system when you assemble everything—if something fails, you know it's likely an integration issue since everything was tested beforehand.

Documentation is Critical: Record every action, outcome, and lesson learned in a report so you can refer to it when making design changes. This is especially important if you made minor modifications during prototyping, such as using a drill to enlarge a hole after accidentally creating an interference fit instead of a clearance fit.

Root Cause Analysis

The Ishikawa analysis and 5 Whys tools can help you identify the root cause for each issue you face during the prototyping phase.

Once the testing and prototyping phase is finished, you can finalize the design and manufacture the flight model for environmental testing.

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

6

Environmental Testing

Once your satellite prototype is working and meets your or your customer's requirements, it's time to qualify it for launch. For environmental testing, you should refer to the relevant standards from your space agency (NASA, ESA, JAXA, ISRO, Roscosmos, or China National Space Administration) or launch vehicle requirements.

Testing Requirements

A Design of Experiments (DoE) for these environmental tests should be created, as your testing center will require information about testing levels and your satellite's attributes. This ensures you test to the required standards.

Common Environmental Tests

  • Vibration Testing: Simulates launch vehicle vibrations
  • Thermal Vacuum Testing: Tests operation in space temperature extremes
  • Shock Testing: Simulates separation and deployment shocks
  • EMC/EMI Testing: Electromagnetic compatibility and interference
  • Acoustic Testing: Tests resistance to launch acoustic environment

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

  • Design of Experiments (DoE)
  • Space agency standards documentation
  • Launch vehicle interface requirements
  • Test facility equipment
7

Release for Launch

Your satellite has successfully completed its testing campaign and is now ready for launch! Follow your launch provider's requirements and the various legal requirements for your mission.

Post-Launch Documentation

Once your mission begins, it's valuable to reflect on the project and keep the lessons learned documentation up to date, ensuring everything is recorded. You may need to repeat the same mission or develop a slightly different payload in the future—having this information available will prevent you from having to relearn everything.

Critical Success Factor: Comprehensive documentation throughout the entire design process becomes invaluable for future missions, troubleshooting, and continuous improvement.

🛠️ Recommended Tools:

  • Lessons Learned Documentation
  • Launch provider compliance checklists
  • Legal and regulatory documentation
  • Post-mission review templates

Key Takeaways

✨ Essential Points to Remember

  • Structure is Essential: There are many variations of the design process. As long as you have a structured approach, you'll avoid the most costly mistakes and meet your mission needs
  • Iteration is Normal: The design process includes feedback loops—expect to revisit earlier stages as you gain new knowledge
  • Documentation Matters: Record requirements, decisions, tests, and lessons learned throughout the entire process
  • Test Early and Often: Testing subsystems individually before integration saves time and reduces debugging complexity
  • Cross-Industry Innovation: Don't limit your research to aerospace—solutions from other industries can be adapted for space applications
  • Use the Right Tools: Each phase has specific tools (FMEA, TRIZ, DoE, etc.) that improve outcomes when applied correctly

Need Expert Assistance?

If you need assistance with your satellite mission, we're here to help.

Contact us at: Andrew.dunn@wyrmengineering.com

About This Guide

This design process methodology has been refined through multiple satellite development projects including the Claymore deployer and various CubeSat and PocketQube missions. It combines industry-standard systems engineering practices with practical lessons learned from real-world space projects.

Author: Andrew Dunn is an aerospace engineer specializing in small satellite design and deployment systems. With extensive experience in CubeSat and PocketQube missions, Andrew has developed and refined this design process through numerous successful space projects.

© 2025 Wyrm Engineering Store. All rights reserved.

Expert resources and tools for satellite design, development, and aerospace engineering.


Zurück zum Blog

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar